23/04: EUROPEAN MILITARY SPENDING & THE CLIMATE EMERGENCY: SQUARING THE CIRCLE

On  Tuesday 23 April, from 16:00 to 17:15 CEST
(10:00 New York – 19:30 New Delhi – 22:00 Manila)

Join us to debate European military spending in 2023 and how it harms peace and the planet
How much has the European continent spent on the military in 2023? How is EU militarisation exacerbating military spending? Why is militarization not compatible with the fight against climate change? How European militarisation and energy issues are linked, using Mozambique as an example?

We will discuss these issues and many others with the following panellists:
• Wendela de Vries, Coordinator & researcher at StopWapenhandel (moderation)
• Jordi Calvo, Office coordinator at International Peace Bureau (IPB-Barcelona) & Global Campaign on Military Spending (GCOMS)
• Laëtitia Sédou, Project officer at the European Network against Arms Trade (ENAAT)
• Nick Buxton, Knowledge Hub coordinator at the Transnational Institute (TNI)
• Daniel Ribeiro, co-founder and researcher at JA! Justiça Ambiental/FoE Mozambique

Please register by filling the form here

Background:
On Monday 22 April, the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI) will release its updated data on world military expenditure for the year 2023. Global military spending has risen every year since 2015, and we expect this trend to accelerate in 2023.
Europe’s military spending will be no exception at both national and European level for those who are members of the EU. The latter have just adopted restrictive EU budgetary rules that will force many Member States to further reduce their public spending, and this will primary affect the welfare state, health or education and even the fight against climate change.
On the other hand, military spending could be considered as “essential investments” and not be included in the calculation of national deficits.

This event is organised by ENAAT in cooperation with the Transnational Institute, the International Peace Bureau and StopWapenhandel, and is part of the Global Days of Action on Military Spending (GDAMS)

 

more news

NBB 2026-1: Quiz, which of the EU institutions is the most arms-industry friendly?

From EP’s early Christmas gifts to EC outbids to counter EDA’s revival, one wonders which of the EU institutions is the most arms industry-friendly…Read our latest newsletter here: NBB 2026-1, 16/01/26 SUMMARY ENAAT news > “Europe’s Hidden Hands: Funding and Arming the Genocide in Gaza” (Webinar series 26/01 & 02/02) > Stop Wapenhandel Blog: Weakening arms transfers rules in the name of ‘security’ and ‘competitiveness’ > Increasing concerns about civil society watchdog role at EU level > Citizens’ initiative asking the EC to suspend the EU-Israel association agreement EU support for the arms industry > EDIP & SAFE:

Read more >

Europe’s Hidden Hands: Funding and Arming the Genocide in Gaza

  Two online webinars to explore the European complicity with the Israel’s genocide in Gaza. Monday 26/01, 6pm CET Monday 02/02, 6pm CET     Register here Programme Monday 26/01, 6pm CET “EU & European complicity through military cooperation and dependency”,  This session confronts Europe’s direct role in enabling Israel’s genocide in Gaza and its decades-long military occupation of Palestine. Far from being champions of diplomacy and peace, European countries and the EU continue arms trade, military cooperation, and political cover for Israel, even as mass atrocities unfold and international law is systematically violated. We will examine how

Read more >

Weakening arms trade rules for the sake of arms dealers

As part of the “Defence Readiness Omnibus’ presented in June 2025, i.e. a deregulation package for the armament sector, the European Commission is proposing to “simplify” the EU directive for arms exports inside the EU, in short the ‘Transfers directive’. A first revision of this directive had been conducted in 2016, already problematic in several respects as we warned at the time. The current revision represents a further step towards the deregulation of arms transfers, with potentially significant impacts on the control of exports outside the EU. Read our Policy Briefing Note for more information on the dangerous

Read more >