How does the EU spend its billions on cutting-edge security and weapons research? Check the OSDE platform

The public platform Open Security Data Europe has been updated to include recent funding information from the European Defence Fund, the EU weapons development fund, and Horizon Europe, the EU’s flagship civilian research and innovation funding program. Open Security Data Europe gives a unique overview of which companies, research centres and public agencies receive EU funding for military and security projects. Furthermore, the platform allows users to search by topic, call, type of technologies or tags across all funds simultaneously, giving journalists and researchers a more complete means to access information.

The 2023 update of Open Security Data Europe shows that a limited number of large arms companies and countries particularly benefit from the European Defence Fund (EDF). Fifteen companies and research centres out of 690 beneficiaries account for 45% of the budget allocated for the EDF 2021 call. Four members of a ‘Group of Personalities’ charged in 2016 with advising the European Commission on setting up the fund – Leonardo, Airbus, Indra and Saab – each receive tens of millions of euros from it.

The four major European military powers, France, Italy, Spain and Germany, receive two-thirds of the EDF budget allocated in 2021 through their national companies. The funding per beneficiary for the EDF 2021 call only has been made public in June 2023, a clear delay in transparency.(…)

 

more news

OSDE 2026

Major Beneficiaries of EDF and ASAP.     Companies European Defence Fund (EDF) After the first three years of the EDF, about a thousand different entities (companies, research institutes, universities, government agencies and a few CSOs) have received funding. It is clear that a large portion of the money goes to a small set of large arms companies. This is exacerbated by the fact that many of these companies own (parts) of other beneficiaries, in the form of takeovers, joint ventures, subsidiaries or major shareholder ownership. With this in mind, almost a quarter of the funding ends up

Read more >

09/06 at 6pm: “Breaking the consensus on EU funding for rearmamament” online conference

ENAAT, GDAMS & StopReArmEurope invite you to an Interactive Online Conference***A militarised garden: Breaking the consensus on EU funding for rearmament * June 9 2026 at 18:00 CEST The session will begin from a practical observation: Members of the European Parliament (MEPs) who challenge the current policy direction -particularly the rapid growth in certain spending priorities- represent a small minority, which limits their influence. Against this backdrop, the discussion will move beyond simple opposition and instead focus on more constructive and strategic exchange, structures around two main pillars:1) Understanding the MEPs’ perspective:Why do many MEPs feel that there

Read more >

Civil society calls on policymakers to prevent the weakening of arms exports control

Today, +25 civil society organisations urge decision makers to prevent arms export control systems from being weakened under the pretext of ‘simplification’ and ‘efficiency’. The negotiations on the EU omnibus package relating to defence are well advanced and about to conclude, including on the proposals modifying the Transfer directive regulating intra-EU arms exports. Weapons and military technology cannot be sold like toys or cans of beans, and EU governments are the ones responsible for ensuring compliance with European and international law, in particular the EU Common position on arms exports, the Arms Trade Treaty and the Convention on

Read more >