Europe’s Hidden Hands: Funding and Arming the Genocide in Gaza

 

Two online webinars to explore the European complicity with the Israel’s genocide in Gaza.

Monday 26/01, 6pm CET

Monday 02/02, 6pm CET

 

 

Programme

Monday 26/01, 6pm CET

“EU & European complicity through military cooperation and dependency”, 

This session confronts Europe’s direct role in enabling Israel’s genocide in Gaza and its decades-long military occupation of Palestine. Far from being champions of diplomacy and peace, European countries and the EU continue arms trade, military cooperation, and political cover for Israel, even as mass atrocities unfold and international law is systematically violated.

We will examine how the narrative of Israeli “security innovation” and “battle-tested” weapons and technologies turned genocide and occupation into a sales pitch meant to deepen Europe’s military dependence on Israeli technology. The session will also centre the BDS movement’s call for a comprehensive military embargo, unpacking why cutting military ties is a key strategy to challenge state-level complicity and push for accountability.

The two main speakers will be Ilham Yaseen (coordinator of the military embargo campaign of the BDS National Committee), and Shir Hever (political economist & manager of the Alliance for Justice between Israelis and Palestinians). The discussion to follow will see contributions from other peace groups such as Banca Armada (Max Carbonell) and members of the European Network Against Arms Trade (ENAAT).

Monday 02/02, 6pm CET

“Turning complicity into arms deals and military partnerships”

This 2nd session will shift to the national level, taking a look on how European governments turn complicity into national policies, arms deals, and military partnerships. While countries like Spain or France have faced large public pressure to halt or reconsider arms exports to Israel, others, especially in Eastern Europe, are quickly expanding military cooperation, prioritizing rearmament over social issues.

Following Romania and the broader Eastern European context, we will also discuss how Israeli arms companies are finding a new frontier within Europe’s broader rearmament. They integrate into national defence systems, create long-term military dependencies, and shield these deals from democratic oversight. However, resistance is growing, with campaigns challenging arms contracts, exposing profiteering from genocide, and building transnational solidarity to hold governments accountable.

The main speakers will be:
Vlad Mureşan, a member of the Palestine Solidarity Cluj-Napoca collective and coordinator of the Elbit Out! Campaign in Romania
– Luca Saltalamacchia, Italian lawyer heading up lawsuits against Leonardo as part of the campaign “In nome della legge. Giù le armi, Leonardo!”
Presentations will be followed by a debate with the speakers and arms trade groups from the European Network Against Arms Trade (ENAAT)

Registration link: https://zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_Xvhu70eERMC2lsNw93QPmg#/registration

more news

NBB 2026-1: Quiz, which of the EU institutions is the most arms-industry friendly?

From EP’s early Christmas gifts to EC outbids to counter EDA’s revival, one wonders which of the EU institutions is the most arms industry-friendly…Read our latest newsletter here: NBB 2026-1, 16/01/26 SUMMARY ENAAT news > “Europe’s Hidden Hands: Funding and Arming the Genocide in Gaza” (Webinar series 26/01 & 02/02) > Stop Wapenhandel Blog: Weakening arms transfers rules in the name of ‘security’ and ‘competitiveness’ > Increasing concerns about civil society watchdog role at EU level > Citizens’ initiative asking the EC to suspend the EU-Israel association agreement EU support for the arms industry > EDIP & SAFE:

Read more >

Weakening arms trade rules for the sake of arms dealers

As part of the “Defence Readiness Omnibus’ presented in June 2025, i.e. a deregulation package for the armament sector, the European Commission is proposing to “simplify” the EU directive for arms exports inside the EU, in short the ‘Transfers directive’. A first revision of this directive had been conducted in 2016, already problematic in several respects as we warned at the time. The current revision represents a further step towards the deregulation of arms transfers, with potentially significant impacts on the control of exports outside the EU. Read our Policy Briefing Note for more information on the dangerous

Read more >