Europe’s Hidden Hands: Funding and Arming the Genocide in Gaza

 

Two online webinars to explore the European complicity with the Israel’s genocide in Gaza.

Monday 26/01, 6pm CET

Monday 02/02, 6pm CET

 

 

Programme

Monday 26/01, 6pm CET

“EU & European complicity through military cooperation and dependency”, 

This session confronts Europe’s direct role in enabling Israel’s genocide in Gaza and its decades-long military occupation of Palestine. Far from being champions of diplomacy and peace, European countries and the EU continue arms trade, military cooperation, and political cover for Israel, even as mass atrocities unfold and international law is systematically violated.

We will examine how the narrative of Israeli “security innovation” and “battle-tested” weapons and technologies turned genocide and occupation into a sales pitch meant to deepen Europe’s military dependence on Israeli technology. The session will also centre the BDS movement’s call for a comprehensive military embargo, unpacking why cutting military ties is a key strategy to challenge state-level complicity and push for accountability.

The two main speakers will be Ilham Yaseen (coordinator of the military embargo campaign of the BDS National Committee), and Shir Hever (political economist & manager of the Alliance for Justice between Israelis and Palestinians). The discussion to follow will see contributions from other peace groups such as Banca Armada (Max Carbonell) and members of the European Network Against Arms Trade (ENAAT).

Monday 02/02, 6pm CET

“Turning complicity into arms deals and military partnerships”

This 2nd session will shift to the national level, taking a look on how European governments turn complicity into national policies, arms deals, and military partnerships. While countries like Spain or France have faced large public pressure to halt or reconsider arms exports to Israel, others, especially in Eastern Europe, are quickly expanding military cooperation, prioritizing rearmament over social issues.

Following Romania and the broader Eastern European context, we will also discuss how Israeli arms companies are finding a new frontier within Europe’s broader rearmament. They integrate into national defence systems, create long-term military dependencies, and shield these deals from democratic oversight. However, resistance is growing, with campaigns challenging arms contracts, exposing profiteering from genocide, and building transnational solidarity to hold governments accountable.

The main speakers will be:
Vlad Mureşan, a member of the Palestine Solidarity Cluj-Napoca collective and coordinator of the Elbit Out! Campaign in Romania
– Luca Saltalamacchia, Italian lawyer heading up lawsuits against Leonardo as part of the campaign “In nome della legge. Giù le armi, Leonardo!”
Presentations will be followed by a debate with the speakers and arms trade groups from the European Network Against Arms Trade (ENAAT)

Registration link: https://zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_Xvhu70eERMC2lsNw93QPmg#/registration

more news

OSDE 2026

Who profits from EU subsidies for the arms industry? Find out below which countries and companies benefit the most from the EU Defence Fund (EDF) and the Ammunition fund (ASAP), and where they export. More information and detailed data are available in the public platform Open Security Data Europe Companies European Defence Fund (EDF) After the first three years of the EDF, about a thousand different entities (companies, research institutes, universities, government agencies and a few CSOs) have received funding. It is clear that a large portion of the money goes to a small set of large arms companies.

Read more >

09/06 at 6pm: “Breaking the consensus on EU funding for rearmamament” online conference

ENAAT, GDAMS & StopReArmEurope invite you to an Interactive Online Conference***A militarised garden: Breaking the consensus on EU funding for rearmament * June 9 2026 at 18:00 CEST The session will begin from a practical observation: Members of the European Parliament (MEPs) who challenge the current policy direction -particularly the rapid growth in certain spending priorities- represent a small minority, which limits their influence. Against this backdrop, the discussion will move beyond simple opposition and instead focus on more constructive and strategic exchange, structures around two main pillars:1) Understanding the MEPs’ perspective:Why do many MEPs feel that there

Read more >

Civil society calls on policymakers to prevent the weakening of arms exports control

Today, +25 civil society organisations urge decision makers to prevent arms export control systems from being weakened under the pretext of ‘simplification’ and ‘efficiency’. The negotiations on the EU omnibus package relating to defence are well advanced and about to conclude, including on the proposals modifying the Transfer directive regulating intra-EU arms exports. Weapons and military technology cannot be sold like toys or cans of beans, and EU governments are the ones responsible for ensuring compliance with European and international law, in particular the EU Common position on arms exports, the Arms Trade Treaty and the Convention on

Read more >