EU Foreign Ministers must take serious action against Saudi Arabia in view of the alarming situation in Yemen, according to ENAAT members

Brussels/Stuttgard/London/Barcelona/Zürich/Bratislava/Paris/Brno/Helsinki/Rome/Amsterdam /Antwerp – 11 peace organisations from the European Network Against Arms Trade (ENAAT), call on the EU ministers to suspend arms sells and consider an arms embargo against Saudi Arabia.

As it has been widely reported, the war in Yemen war is having an extremely severe impact on civilians and on vital infrastructure including hospitals, schools and access to drinkable water, amounting to serious violations of both International Humanitarian Law (IHL) and International Human Rights Law and largely due to the air-strikes carried out by Saudi Arabia and its allies according to UN sources.

ENAAT members confirm that the figures show that EU member states are the main providers of arms to Saudi Arabia: according to SIPRI, 59% of Saudi arms imports came from Europe between 2009 and 2014. Between 2009 and 2013, European countries gave licenses for transfers of military equipments and technologies to Saudi Arabia worth more than 19 billions. Even since the first credible reports of violations of IHL by the Saudi-led coalition became public in May 2015, EU countries like France, United Kingdom, Germany, Belgium, Spain and Italy continued agreeing contracts or providing licences for huge amounts of arms transfers to Saudi Arabia, including military training, for the mere profit of private companies, as many press reports indicate. This is in clear violation of both the EU Common Position on Arms export controls2 and the UN the Arms Trade Treaty they are party to.

In view of the informal Foreign Affairs Council to meet in Amsterdam on Friday and Saturday, we urge:

EU Member States to immediately suspend all arms transfers and other military support to Saudi Arabia and its allies in this conflict

High representative Federica Mogherini to initiate an arms embargo (including military training) against Saudi Arabia at the FAC meeting

EU Member States to apply a much stricter interpretation of the EU Common Position and to allow national parliamentary controls over its implementation in countries where this does not happen

Signed by:

Kampagne gegen Rüstungsexport (bei Ohne Rüstung Leben, Germany) – www.ohne-ruestung-leben.de

Campaign Against Arms Trade (UK) – www.caat.org.uk

Centre Delàs for Peace Studies (Spain) – www.centredelas.org

Group Switzerland Without an Army – GSoA (Switzerland) – http://www.gsoa.ch

Human Rights Institute (Slovakia) – www.ludskeprava.sk

L’Observatoire des armements (France) – www.obsarm.org

NESEHNUTÍ (Czech republic) – http://nesehnuti.cz/about-us/

Peace Union of Finland – http://www.rauhanliitto.fi/frontpage

Rete Italiana per il Disarmo (Italy) – www.disarmo.org

Stop Wapenhandel (The Netherlands) – www.stopwapenhandel.org

Vredesactie (Belgium) – www.vredesactie.be

more news

OSDE 2026

Who profits from EU subsidies for the arms industry? Find out below which countries and companies benefit the most from the EU Defence Fund (EDF) and the Ammunition fund (ASAP), and where they export. More information and detailed data are available in the public platform Open Security Data Europe Companies European Defence Fund (EDF) After the first three years of the EDF, about a thousand different entities (companies, research institutes, universities, government agencies and a few CSOs) have received funding. It is clear that a large portion of the money goes to a small set of large arms companies.

Read more >

09/06 at 6pm: “Breaking the consensus on EU funding for rearmamament” online conference

ENAAT, GDAMS & StopReArmEurope invite you to an Interactive Online Conference***A militarised garden: Breaking the consensus on EU funding for rearmament * June 9 2026 at 18:00 CEST The session will begin from a practical observation: Members of the European Parliament (MEPs) who challenge the current policy direction -particularly the rapid growth in certain spending priorities- represent a small minority, which limits their influence. Against this backdrop, the discussion will move beyond simple opposition and instead focus on more constructive and strategic exchange, structures around two main pillars:1) Understanding the MEPs’ perspective:Why do many MEPs feel that there

Read more >

Civil society calls on policymakers to prevent the weakening of arms exports control

Today, +25 civil society organisations urge decision makers to prevent arms export control systems from being weakened under the pretext of ‘simplification’ and ‘efficiency’. The negotiations on the EU omnibus package relating to defence are well advanced and about to conclude, including on the proposals modifying the Transfer directive regulating intra-EU arms exports. Weapons and military technology cannot be sold like toys or cans of beans, and EU governments are the ones responsible for ensuring compliance with European and international law, in particular the EU Common position on arms exports, the Arms Trade Treaty and the Convention on

Read more >