The EU should promote peace not subsidize the arms industry!

Peace groups take action to prevent EU public money for military research

Amsterdam, Barcelona, Brussels, Helsinki, London, Lyon, Prague, Rome, Stockholm

In an appeal to Members of the European Parliament and of EU member states’ parliaments, peace campaigners and the European Network Against Arms Trade are calling to say ‘no’ to the inclusion of arms industry research into the EU budget. The parliamentarians are asked to reject the Preparatory Action (PA) on Defence research which the European Commission wants to include in the new budget line, to be discussed from next week. “Europe should support peace not subsidize weapons” according to the campaigners.

After several years of persistent and discreet work, in particular from arms industry lobby groups such as ASD, and with the support of some Member States and MEPs, the EU is only a few steps away from starting to subsidize research for arms production using European public money. A Preparatory Action (PA) on Defence research written by an advisory ‘Group of Personalities’, more than half of them industry representatives, is included in the 2017 draft Budget. The arms industry is advising the EU to subsidize the arms industry. The Commission already has accepted this PA and the decision is now in the hands of the European Parliament and the Member States.

This is not the EU we want!

So far, military goods always have been excluded from the EU budget lines. This is about to change. And it is just the beginning, as the long-term objective is to set-up a fully-fledged European Defence Research Programme worth EUR 3.5 billion over 2021-2027. The EU budget being non-extendable, this will necessarily mean drastic cuts to the detriment of other -civilian- actions. Moreover, the stated first goal of these subsidies is to preserve the competitiveness of the arms industry and its capacity to export abroad,

including to countries contributing to instability and taking part to deadly conflicts, such as Saudi Arabia.

We have to stop this now!

ENAAT is appealing to European and national parliamentarians and to national governments to halt the inclusion of arms industry research into the EU budget. No EU money should go to the arms industry. Research money should go to projects developing non violent ways of resolving and preventing conflicts, and in particular tackling root-causes of instability such as climate change. See also the ENAAT Position on Defence research PA_FINAL

More reference:

European military industry: EU, give us 3.5 billion euros for military research

more news

NBB 2025-1: REARM Europe plan, headlong rush into the rearmament race

This new edition of our ‘News from the Brussels’ Bubble’ focuses on the REARM Europe plan, intending to bring European militarisation to a different scale. Read it here: NBB2025-1, 07/03/2025 summary: EU funding for the arms industry– Negotiations on EDIP still stalled one year after proposal publication– EDF 2025 prioritise ground systems, incl. mass production of kamikaze drones– “EU defense industry lobbying soars” – Politico confirms findings of our 2023 report– “Omnibus for defence”, or how to facilitate arms dealers’ business, including exports?– EIB coming shift in lending policy: all but lethal weapons and no more ceiling Other

Read more >

New ENAAT website counters clarion calls for European rearmament with valuable information

(read the press release in French) 05 March 2025 – Today the European Network Against Arms Trade (ENAAT) launches its new website (www.enaat.org), a unique tool for information and critical analysis about European arms exports and EU policies supporting the military industry, and how they exacerbate the global arms race. On this International Day for Disarmament and Non-Proliferation Awareness, and on the eve of the special European Summit on defence which is expected to confirm an unprecedented drive for rearmament at the EU level, in contradiction with the original idea of a Union conceived as a ‘peace project’,

Read more >

Opacity and ethical shortfalls in first EDF projects: new report by Centre Delas & ENAAT

In this report, the Center Delàs d’Estudis per la Pau and the European Network Against Arms Trade (ENAAT) highlight the opacity of the projects benefiting from the first round of financing of the European Defense Fund. This research discuss transparency issues during the Mid-Term review of the EDF projects funded under the 2021 Call of the European Comission (EC), focusing on a representative sample of 6 projects. The investigation shows that the problematic aspects already detected in the initial PADR and EDIDP calls have not improved, being as questionable and controversial as in their day, and even with

Read more >