‘Fanning the Flames: how the EU is fuelling a new arms race’ – New report

We release today our new report ‘Fanning the Flames: how the EU is fuelling a new arms race’, in collaboration with TNI

Days after European leaders agreed to drastically increase military spending at the Versailles Summit,our report reveals how the EU’s first defence programmes worth almost €600 million are marred in conflicts of interest, corruption allegations, and fall significantly short of meeting the most basic ethical and legal standards.

Read our Press Release in English and French

Read the full report Here, and the Executive Summary in EnglishFrenchGermanSpanishItalian and Dutch

In ‘Fanning the Flames: How the European Union is fuelling a new arms race’ the European Network against the Arms Trade (ENAAT) and the Transnational Institute (TNI) examine how European public money is being used to fund controversial military wares.

The report reveals that EU decision making processes have been captured by highly lucrative arms corporations that exploit these political spaces for their own gain.

The companies the EU is funding under these budgets are involved in dubious and highly controversial arms deals, produce nuclear weapons, and many are facing corruption charges. The ethical and legal checks applied to approve the funding of novel and potentially lethal weaponry fall short of even the most basic standards.

The report focuses specifically on how funding for two precursor programmes to the European Defence Fund is being spent and draws broader conclusions on what direction European militarism is likely to take in the coming years.

 

more news

09/06 at 6pm: “Breaking the consensus on EU funding for rearmamament” online conference

ENAAT, GDAMS & StopReArmEurope invite you to an Interactive Online Conference***A militarised garden: Breaking the consensus on EU funding for rearmament * June 9 2026 at 18:00 CEST The session will begin from a practical observation: Members of the European Parliament (MEPs) who challenge the current policy direction -particularly the rapid growth in certain spending priorities- represent a small minority, which limits their influence. Against this backdrop, the discussion will move beyond simple opposition and instead focus on more constructive and strategic exchange, structures around two main pillars:1) Understanding the MEPs’ perspective:Why do many MEPs feel that there

Read more >

Civil society calls on policymakers to prevent the weakening of arms exports control

Today, +25 civil society organisations urge decision makers to prevent arms export control systems from being weakened under the pretext of ‘simplification’ and ‘efficiency’. The negotiations on the EU omnibus package relating to defence are well advanced and about to conclude, including on the proposals modifying the Transfer directive regulating intra-EU arms exports. Weapons and military technology cannot be sold like toys or cans of beans, and EU governments are the ones responsible for ensuring compliance with European and international law, in particular the EU Common position on arms exports, the Arms Trade Treaty and the Convention on

Read more >

NBB 2026-3: ““maximised flexibility for arms, minimal safeguards for the people”

From the European Competitiveness Fund to the deregulation package and military mobility, maximised flexibility for rearmament but minimal safeguards for the people… Read our latest Newsletter here: ENAAT NBB 2026-3, 30/04/2026 SUMMARY ENAAT News Join the closing event of the Global Days Against Military Spending EU funding for the arms industry – Post-2027 funding: maximised flexibility and ‘merit-based’ approach – Deal on the deregulation of the arms sector postponed – News briefs Other aspects of EU militarisation – What about the EU mutual defence clause?! – Expected clash on EU military mobility package – EU-Ukraine ‘drone deals’ –

Read more >