‘ExitArms’ database reveals EU funded arms producers export to warring parties

This week, the environmental and human rights organizations Facing Finance and Urgewald published the “ExitArms” database: www.exitarms.org.
It is the first publicly available, global database on companies supplying arms to warring states. The launch is supported by ENAAT, the European Network Against Arms Trade.
So far, the database covers the years 2015 to 2020. It lists around 500 companies that were involved in almost 1,400 arms exports during this period – along the entire arms supply chain and either directly, through subsidiaries or via joint ventures. This supplied 33 warring parties involved in 52 wars, most of them domestic.
The database reveals that 8 of the top 10 beneficiaries of the EU Defence Fund have track records of delivering weaponry to warring parties in conflicts. 
In order to avoid that EU-funded weaponry end up fueling conflicts, The EU should not fund companies supplying arms to warring parties.
The finance sector should also refuse green-washing the arms industry, which seems to consider that international standards of the UN and the OECD, which provide for the respect of human rights in business practices among other social and ethical criteria, do not apply to it.  Yet the arms lobby is campaigning in order to be considered as a sustainable sector, and as such have access to “cheaper” financing. This would divert resources from major civilian priorities.

Read the Press Release in English or French, the Media briefing and its annex

more news

OSDE 2026

Who profits from EU subsidies for the arms industry? Find out below which countries and companies benefit the most from the EU Defence Fund (EDF) and the Ammunition fund (ASAP), and where they export. More information and detailed data are available in the public platform Open Security Data Europe Companies European Defence Fund (EDF) After the first three years of the EDF, about a thousand different entities (companies, research institutes, universities, government agencies and a few CSOs) have received funding. It is clear that a large portion of the money goes to a small set of large arms companies.

Read more >

09/06 at 6pm: “Breaking the consensus on EU funding for rearmamament” online conference

ENAAT, GDAMS & StopReArmEurope invite you to an Interactive Online Conference***A militarised garden: Breaking the consensus on EU funding for rearmament * June 9 2026 at 18:00 CEST The session will begin from a practical observation: Members of the European Parliament (MEPs) who challenge the current policy direction -particularly the rapid growth in certain spending priorities- represent a small minority, which limits their influence. Against this backdrop, the discussion will move beyond simple opposition and instead focus on more constructive and strategic exchange, structures around two main pillars:1) Understanding the MEPs’ perspective:Why do many MEPs feel that there

Read more >

Civil society calls on policymakers to prevent the weakening of arms exports control

Today, +25 civil society organisations urge decision makers to prevent arms export control systems from being weakened under the pretext of ‘simplification’ and ‘efficiency’. The negotiations on the EU omnibus package relating to defence are well advanced and about to conclude, including on the proposals modifying the Transfer directive regulating intra-EU arms exports. Weapons and military technology cannot be sold like toys or cans of beans, and EU governments are the ones responsible for ensuring compliance with European and international law, in particular the EU Common position on arms exports, the Arms Trade Treaty and the Convention on

Read more >