‘ExitArms’ database reveals EU funded arms producers export to warring parties

This week, the environmental and human rights organizations Facing Finance and Urgewald published the “ExitArms” database: www.exitarms.org.
It is the first publicly available, global database on companies supplying arms to warring states. The launch is supported by ENAAT, the European Network Against Arms Trade.
So far, the database covers the years 2015 to 2020. It lists around 500 companies that were involved in almost 1,400 arms exports during this period – along the entire arms supply chain and either directly, through subsidiaries or via joint ventures. This supplied 33 warring parties involved in 52 wars, most of them domestic.
The database reveals that 8 of the top 10 beneficiaries of the EU Defence Fund have track records of delivering weaponry to warring parties in conflicts. 
In order to avoid that EU-funded weaponry end up fueling conflicts, The EU should not fund companies supplying arms to warring parties.
The finance sector should also refuse green-washing the arms industry, which seems to consider that international standards of the UN and the OECD, which provide for the respect of human rights in business practices among other social and ethical criteria, do not apply to it.  Yet the arms lobby is campaigning in order to be considered as a sustainable sector, and as such have access to “cheaper” financing. This would divert resources from major civilian priorities.

Read the Press Release in English or French, the Media briefing and its annex

more news

“Security for Whom?” CSOs call EU leaders to move the money from the military to human security

Ahead of the European Council held on 18 & 19 of June, where leaders will discuss the next EU budgetary cycle, civil society organisations from across the spectrum urge EU decision-makers to reject the military budget surge and invest in human security instead Open Letter initiated by TNI, ENAAT, Stop ReArm Europe 17 June 2026 Dear Heads of States and Governments, In the run-up to the next European Council taking place this week, at which you will discuss the next Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF 2028–2034), with a view to reaching a final agreement by the end of the

Read more >

Who profits from EU subsidies for the arms industry and where they export: read our fact-sheet

Who profits from EU subsidies for the arms industry? Find out below which countries and companies benefit the most from the EU Defence Fund (EDF) and the Ammunition fund (ASAP), and where they export. More information and detailed data are available in the public platform Open Security Data Europe Companies European Defence Fund (EDF) After the first three years of the EDF, about a thousand different entities (companies, research institutes, universities, government agencies and a few CSOs) have received funding. It is clear that a large portion of the money goes to a small set of large arms companies.

Read more >

09/06 at 6pm: “Breaking the consensus on EU funding for rearmamament” online conference

ENAAT, GDAMS & StopReArmEurope invite you to an Interactive Online Conference***A militarised garden: Breaking the consensus on EU funding for rearmament * June 9 2026 at 18:00 CEST The session will begin from a practical observation: Members of the European Parliament (MEPs) who challenge the current policy direction -particularly the rapid growth in certain spending priorities- represent a small minority, which limits their influence. Against this backdrop, the discussion will move beyond simple opposition and instead focus on more constructive and strategic exchange, structures around two main pillars:1) Understanding the MEPs’ perspective:Why do many MEPs feel that there

Read more >