Opacity and ethical shortfalls in first EDF projects: new report by Centre Delas & ENAAT

In this report, the Center Delàs d’Estudis per la Pau and the European Network Against Arms Trade (ENAAT) highlight the opacity of the projects benefiting from the first round of financing of the European Defense Fund. This research discuss transparency issues during the Mid-Term review of the EDF projects funded under the 2021 Call of the European Comission (EC), focusing on a representative sample of 6 projects. The investigation shows that the problematic aspects already detected in the initial PADR and EDIDP calls have not improved, being as questionable and controversial as in their day, and even with a tendency to worsen. Some of the problems identified are: lack of transparency in the application of EU ethical guidelines; lack of transparency in the project review process; lack of transparency in technical aspects that can generate situations that are ethically unacceptable and contrary to international law; or lack of control in the use of unmanned systems that use AI technologies.

Read the press release in Spanish, English and French

Access the full report and its executive summary in English and Spanish here

more news

09/06 at 6pm: “Breaking the consensus on EU funding for rearmamament” online conference

ENAAT, GDAMS & StopReArmEurope invite you to an Interactive Online Conference***A militarised garden: Breaking the consensus on EU funding for rearmament * June 9 2026 at 18:00 CEST The session will begin from a practical observation: Members of the European Parliament (MEPs) who challenge the current policy direction -particularly the rapid growth in certain spending priorities- represent a small minority, which limits their influence. Against this backdrop, the discussion will move beyond simple opposition and instead focus on more constructive and strategic exchange, structures around two main pillars:1) Understanding the MEPs’ perspective:Why do many MEPs feel that there

Read more >

Civil society calls on policymakers to prevent the weakening of arms exports control

Today, +25 civil society organisations urge decision makers to prevent arms export control systems from being weakened under the pretext of ‘simplification’ and ‘efficiency’. The negotiations on the EU omnibus package relating to defence are well advanced and about to conclude, including on the proposals modifying the Transfer directive regulating intra-EU arms exports. Weapons and military technology cannot be sold like toys or cans of beans, and EU governments are the ones responsible for ensuring compliance with European and international law, in particular the EU Common position on arms exports, the Arms Trade Treaty and the Convention on

Read more >

NBB 2026-3: ““maximised flexibility for arms, minimal safeguards for the people”

From the European Competitiveness Fund to the deregulation package and military mobility, maximised flexibility for rearmament but minimal safeguards for the people… Read our latest Newsletter here: ENAAT NBB 2026-3, 30/04/2026 SUMMARY ENAAT News Join the closing event of the Global Days Against Military Spending EU funding for the arms industry – Post-2027 funding: maximised flexibility and ‘merit-based’ approach – Deal on the deregulation of the arms sector postponed – News briefs Other aspects of EU militarisation – What about the EU mutual defence clause?! – Expected clash on EU military mobility package – EU-Ukraine ‘drone deals’ –

Read more >