ENAAT position on EU Defence Industry Programme

The European Defence Industry Programme: Another step towards arms race and exports deregulation

In March 2024 the European Commission presented its Proposal for a Regulation establishing the European Defence Industry Programme (EDIP), accompanying the European Defence Industrial Strategy (EDIS). While EU member states have been discussing the proposal for a year now, in particular debating whether the funds may also be used to buy arms from outside the EU, the European Parliament in March 2025 decided to fast-track its own decision-making process through an urgent procedure limiting the possibilities for discussion and for tabling amendments, with a view to a final vote in early May. The Parliament also reportedly wants to add €15 billion to the proposed budget of €1.5 billion, from the proposed Security Action for Europe (SAFE) loans.
This paper does not intend to be an exhaustive presentation of all the EDIP provisions but to highlight the aspects that aim to increase European arms sales and the influence of the arms industry in European policies. In this respect, EDIP is ultimately a further step in a series of similar measures contributing to the growing militarisation of the European Union, which will greatly exacerbate the global arms race, and represents more of a threat to peace than a solution to growing tensions.
That context makes it even more problematic that the Parliament is severely restricting its own role in discussing the EDIP proposal.

Read the ENAAT Position paper on EDIP

more news

09/06 at 6pm: “Breaking the consensus on EU funding for rearmamament” online conference

ENAAT, GDAMS & StopReArmEurope invite you to an Interactive Online Conference***A militarised garden: Breaking the consensus on EU funding for rearmament * June 9 2026 at 18:00 CEST The session will begin from a practical observation: Members of the European Parliament (MEPs) who challenge the current policy direction -particularly the rapid growth in certain spending priorities- represent a small minority, which limits their influence. Against this backdrop, the discussion will move beyond simple opposition and instead focus on more constructive and strategic exchange, structures around two main pillars:1) Understanding the MEPs’ perspective:Why do many MEPs feel that there

Read more >

Civil society calls on policymakers to prevent the weakening of arms exports control

Today, +25 civil society organisations urge decision makers to prevent arms export control systems from being weakened under the pretext of ‘simplification’ and ‘efficiency’. The negotiations on the EU omnibus package relating to defence are well advanced and about to conclude, including on the proposals modifying the Transfer directive regulating intra-EU arms exports. Weapons and military technology cannot be sold like toys or cans of beans, and EU governments are the ones responsible for ensuring compliance with European and international law, in particular the EU Common position on arms exports, the Arms Trade Treaty and the Convention on

Read more >

NBB 2026-3: ““maximised flexibility for arms, minimal safeguards for the people”

From the European Competitiveness Fund to the deregulation package and military mobility, maximised flexibility for rearmament but minimal safeguards for the people… Read our latest Newsletter here: ENAAT NBB 2026-3, 30/04/2026 SUMMARY ENAAT News Join the closing event of the Global Days Against Military Spending EU funding for the arms industry – Post-2027 funding: maximised flexibility and ‘merit-based’ approach – Deal on the deregulation of the arms sector postponed – News briefs Other aspects of EU militarisation – What about the EU mutual defence clause?! – Expected clash on EU military mobility package – EU-Ukraine ‘drone deals’ –

Read more >