EDF 2021 projects fit ill with EU’s founding principles and values and will boost military spending in Europe

 

The Centre Delàs, a member of ENAAT, launched today a new Working Paper in cooperation with ENAAT, GCOMS and the International Peace Bureau, which analyses the first R&D projects of the European Defence Fund (EDF), a crucial piece of the process of militarisation begun by the EU several years ago.

The EDF is set to greatly boost military spending in Europe, both through common & national budgets. By co-financing development projects & requiring member states to purchase resulting products, EU funding will have a multiplier effect, with total expenditure being 5 times higher.

“All projects analysed in this Working Paper can be regarded as fitting ill with the EU’s foundational principles and values. And the projects proposing the use of new deep-learning techniques in Artificial Intelligence (A.I.) are more concerning” conclude the authors.
EDF funded projects proposing the use of new deep-learning techniques in Artificial Intelligence #AI are concerning given their inherent proneness to error, ‘the Black Box Nature’ of A.I. and the need for ‘explicability’, and the lack of proper oversight in A.I.’s use.

Indra (Spain), Leonardo (Italy), Thales (France), are some of the companies receiving grants that have long histories of corruption, irregularities, and questionable practices. However, none of this has stopped the European Commission’s decision showering them with public funds.
For years the EU has chosen the path of militarisation with a dual purpose: to safeguard its economic & geopolitical interests, and to fortify itself against migratory flows.

Read the working paper ‘Analysis of the first R&D projects of the European Defence Fund‘, also available in Spanish and Catalan

more news

OSDE 2026

Major Beneficiaries of EDF and ASAP.     Companies European Defence Fund (EDF) After the first three years of the EDF, about a thousand different entities (companies, research institutes, universities, government agencies and a few CSOs) have received funding. It is clear that a large portion of the money goes to a small set of large arms companies. This is exacerbated by the fact that many of these companies own (parts) of other beneficiaries, in the form of takeovers, joint ventures, subsidiaries or major shareholder ownership. With this in mind, almost a quarter of the funding ends up

Read more >

09/06 at 6pm: “Breaking the consensus on EU funding for rearmamament” online conference

ENAAT, GDAMS & StopReArmEurope invite you to an Interactive Online Conference***A militarised garden: Breaking the consensus on EU funding for rearmament * June 9 2026 at 18:00 CEST The session will begin from a practical observation: Members of the European Parliament (MEPs) who challenge the current policy direction -particularly the rapid growth in certain spending priorities- represent a small minority, which limits their influence. Against this backdrop, the discussion will move beyond simple opposition and instead focus on more constructive and strategic exchange, structures around two main pillars:1) Understanding the MEPs’ perspective:Why do many MEPs feel that there

Read more >

Civil society calls on policymakers to prevent the weakening of arms exports control

Today, +25 civil society organisations urge decision makers to prevent arms export control systems from being weakened under the pretext of ‘simplification’ and ‘efficiency’. The negotiations on the EU omnibus package relating to defence are well advanced and about to conclude, including on the proposals modifying the Transfer directive regulating intra-EU arms exports. Weapons and military technology cannot be sold like toys or cans of beans, and EU governments are the ones responsible for ensuring compliance with European and international law, in particular the EU Common position on arms exports, the Arms Trade Treaty and the Convention on

Read more >