NBB #2023-08: Ombudsman opens inquiry on EDF independent experts & risks of conflicts of interest

The latest ENAAT Newsletter is available here: ENAAT NBB 2023-08_17.11.2023

The main news are the Ombudsman inquiry into how the EC ensures independent experts assessing EDF projects do not have conflicts of interest, EU Defence Industry Strategy expected early 2024, and EU Defence ministers calling for better access to (sustainable) finance for arms industry

Summary

EU funding for the arms industry
– EU Defence Fund: Ombudsman’s inquiry on independent experts, 2021 projects fit ill with EU founding principles and values
– EC will present European Defence Industry Strategy early 2024, to include EDIP
– Next EU parliament: security & defence upgraded and women’s rights downgraded?
– EU Defence & Security Summit: more money, more exports, strategic autonomy
– 2024 EU budget: Defence less impacted by austerity
– ASAP calls already launched, Nammo CEO wants 10-to-15-year contracts
– EDA board: EU Defence ministers call for access t finance for arms industry
– EIB top race: French support conditional on backing investment in nuclear energy and defence

other aspects of European militarisation
– MILEX23: EU carries out first military live exercise in Cádiz
– Expected tough discussions on MFF revision risk diverting funds to the military?
– EU Defence discussed by MoDs will also be on December EU summit agenda
– EU extends support to Arms Trade Treaty

EU Peace Facility & related news
– EPF/Ukraine: 8th Tranche still blocked, special €20bn envelop still not agreed
– New assistance measures under EUMAM Ukraine to come soon
– EU unlikely to reach objective of 1 million rounds of ammunition to Ukraine
– other EPF measures: lethal equipment for Somalia?

 

more news

OSDE 2026

2 June 2026

Major Beneficiaries of EDF and ASAP.     Companies European Defence Fund (EDF) After the first three years of the EDF, about a thousand different entities (companies, research institutes, universities, government agencies and a few CSOs) have received funding. It is clear that a large portion of the money goes to a small set of large arms companies. This is exacerbated by the fact that many of these companies own (parts) of other beneficiaries, in the form of takeovers, joint ventures, subsidiaries or major shareholder ownership. With this in mind, almost a quarter of the funding ends up

Read more >

09/06 at 6pm: “Breaking the consensus on EU funding for rearmamament” online conference

21 May 2026

ENAAT, GDAMS & StopReArmEurope invite you to an Interactive Online Conference***A militarised garden: Breaking the consensus on EU funding for rearmament * June 9 2026 at 18:00 CEST The session will begin from a practical observation: Members of the European Parliament (MEPs) who challenge the current policy direction -particularly the rapid growth in certain spending priorities- represent a small minority, which limits their influence. Against this backdrop, the discussion will move beyond simple opposition and instead focus on more constructive and strategic exchange, structures around two main pillars:1) Understanding the MEPs’ perspective:Why do many MEPs feel that there

Read more >

Civil society calls on policymakers to prevent the weakening of arms exports control

8 May 2026

Today, +25 civil society organisations urge decision makers to prevent arms export control systems from being weakened under the pretext of ‘simplification’ and ‘efficiency’. The negotiations on the EU omnibus package relating to defence are well advanced and about to conclude, including on the proposals modifying the Transfer directive regulating intra-EU arms exports. Weapons and military technology cannot be sold like toys or cans of beans, and EU governments are the ones responsible for ensuring compliance with European and international law, in particular the EU Common position on arms exports, the Arms Trade Treaty and the Convention on

Read more >