NBB 2025-3: Future Competitiveness fund will expand EU militarisation

The latest issue of the ENAAT newsletter ‘News from the Brussels’ Bubble’ is now available online here

Summary: 

EU funding for the arms industry

  • Defence Fund: less transparency with first classified project, future Competitiveness Fund
  • SAFE Regulation adopted and entered into force despite controversial legal basis
  • EU Cohesion Fund: diverting money for large arms dealers and military mobility
  • Consultation on mini-omnibus for defence, simplification package expected 17 June
  • EDIP: Council negotiations to resume this week, agreement under Danish presidency?
  • EIB: €40 million package for defence and cooperation with national counterparts
  • EU start-up strategy with focus on military and dual-use tech

Other aspects of EU militarisation

  • EP priorities for post-2027 EU budget: competitiveness, rearmament, deregulation
  • EU MoDs gatherings: few decisions taken, next steps at NATO and European Summits
  • EU-UK deal: much ado for nothing or first step towards arms industry cooperation?
  • PESCO: Switzerland to be invited to participate in ‘Cyber Ranges Federations’ project
  • Military power ‘precondition’ for EU economic hegemony according to ECB chair

EU Peace Facility and related news

  • EU RDC operational but lacking political agreement on “how, why and when”?
  • Ukraine: one billion for military aid under the Danish initiative
  • Prospects for a military assistance measure for Togo in West Africa
  • EEAS cut staff in delegations: less human resources for non-violent policies

more news

OSDE 2026

2 June 2026

Who profits from EU subsidies for the arms industry? Find out below which countries and companies benefit the most from the EU Defence Fund (EDF) and the Ammunition fund (ASAP), and where they export. More information and detailed data are available in the public platform Open Security Data Europe Companies European Defence Fund (EDF) After the first three years of the EDF, about a thousand different entities (companies, research institutes, universities, government agencies and a few CSOs) have received funding. It is clear that a large portion of the money goes to a small set of large arms companies.

Read more >

09/06 at 6pm: “Breaking the consensus on EU funding for rearmamament” online conference

21 May 2026

ENAAT, GDAMS & StopReArmEurope invite you to an Interactive Online Conference***A militarised garden: Breaking the consensus on EU funding for rearmament * June 9 2026 at 18:00 CEST The session will begin from a practical observation: Members of the European Parliament (MEPs) who challenge the current policy direction -particularly the rapid growth in certain spending priorities- represent a small minority, which limits their influence. Against this backdrop, the discussion will move beyond simple opposition and instead focus on more constructive and strategic exchange, structures around two main pillars:1) Understanding the MEPs’ perspective:Why do many MEPs feel that there

Read more >

Civil society calls on policymakers to prevent the weakening of arms exports control

8 May 2026

Today, +25 civil society organisations urge decision makers to prevent arms export control systems from being weakened under the pretext of ‘simplification’ and ‘efficiency’. The negotiations on the EU omnibus package relating to defence are well advanced and about to conclude, including on the proposals modifying the Transfer directive regulating intra-EU arms exports. Weapons and military technology cannot be sold like toys or cans of beans, and EU governments are the ones responsible for ensuring compliance with European and international law, in particular the EU Common position on arms exports, the Arms Trade Treaty and the Convention on

Read more >