ENAAT calls MEPs to reject EU funding for proliferation of ammunition & missiles

 

The European Network Against Arms Trade sent today an Open letter to Euro-parliamentarians, urging them to vote against the proposal of EU funding for the arms industry to boost their production of ammunition ad missiles.
Read the Open letter here  in English and in French

ENAAT calls on MEPs, and those members of the negotiating team in particular, not to give in to blackmail and to reject the ASAP Regulation outright:

  • This text is already highly problematic in its original version and will above all contribute to the proliferation of ammunition and missiles in the world, which will only fuel conflicts.
  • It undermines labour law and environmental norms normally applied to the industry, and experience of the Defence Fund pilot programmes shows that these “exceptions” rather create precedents which then tend to become the norm.
    These derogations are particularly shocking when, at the same time, the industry is waging an offensive campaign to present itself as sustainable and socially beneficial so that it can divert part of the sustainable finance to its own benefit.
  • In view of the Member States’ position, any compromise version can only accentuate the most deleterious effects of this Regulation and transform it once and for all into unconditional subsidies for an outspoken military industry, which shamelessly uses and abuses the Russian invasion and the misfortune of the Ukrainians to defend its financial interests, with the complicity of many national governments.
  • The European Parliament must seize this last opportunity to defend its independence and its role as a decision-maker, otherwise it runs the risk of definitely becoming a mere recording chamber for a European defence policy that is subservient to soverignist and industrial interests. Such a precedent can only weaken the European democratic project as a whole and deceive European citizens.

more news

“Security for Whom?” CSOs call EU leaders to move the money from the military to human security

Ahead of the European Council held on 18 & 19 of June, where leaders will discuss the next EU budgetary cycle, civil society organisations from across the spectrum urge EU decision-makers to reject the military budget surge and invest in human security instead Open Letter initiated by TNI, ENAAT, Stop ReArm Europe 17 June 2026 Dear Heads of States and Governments, In the run-up to the next European Council taking place this week, at which you will discuss the next Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF 2028–2034), with a view to reaching a final agreement by the end of the

Read more >

Who profits from EU subsidies for the arms industry and where they export: read our fact-sheet

Who profits from EU subsidies for the arms industry? Find out below which countries and companies benefit the most from the EU Defence Fund (EDF) and the Ammunition fund (ASAP), and where they export. More information and detailed data are available in the public platform Open Security Data Europe Companies European Defence Fund (EDF) After the first three years of the EDF, about a thousand different entities (companies, research institutes, universities, government agencies and a few CSOs) have received funding. It is clear that a large portion of the money goes to a small set of large arms companies.

Read more >

09/06 at 6pm: “Breaking the consensus on EU funding for rearmamament” online conference

ENAAT, GDAMS & StopReArmEurope invite you to an Interactive Online Conference***A militarised garden: Breaking the consensus on EU funding for rearmament * June 9 2026 at 18:00 CEST The session will begin from a practical observation: Members of the European Parliament (MEPs) who challenge the current policy direction -particularly the rapid growth in certain spending priorities- represent a small minority, which limits their influence. Against this backdrop, the discussion will move beyond simple opposition and instead focus on more constructive and strategic exchange, structures around two main pillars:1) Understanding the MEPs’ perspective:Why do many MEPs feel that there

Read more >